Home / Resources / Criminal Defence / Weapons & Firearms Offences
CRIMINAL DEFENCE GUIDE
Weapons and firearms cases are rarely decided by the object alone. The prosecution may need to prove possession, knowledge, authorization, classification, purpose and the legality of the police search that produced the evidence.
Prepared by Tatyana Trusz, Trusz Law • Updated July 2026 • 15 min read
QUICK ANSWER
It depends on the offence. A prosecution may need to prove that the accused possessed the firearm or weapon, knew enough about its presence or nature, lacked the required licence or registration, possessed it for a prohibited purpose, or breached a court order.
Some cases turn on actual possession. Others involve alleged constructive or joint possession in a vehicle, home or shared space. The defence often examines control, knowledge, fingerprints or DNA, statements, licensing records, the firearm’s legal classification and whether the police lawfully found and seized it.
IN THIS GUIDE
RELATED CRIMINAL DEFENCE
FACING A FIREARMS CHARGE?
Possession, knowledge, classification, licensing and the police search can all be decisive.
THE SHORT ANSWER
The Criminal Code contains a group of separate offences involving firearms, weapons, ammunition and prohibited devices. The required proof changes from charge to charge.
The defence may need to ask:
A serious weapons charge should therefore be analyzed offence by offence rather than treated as a single category of “gun possession.”
KEY TAKEAWAYS
COMMON CHARGES
| Offence | What the provision addresses |
|---|---|
| Careless use or storage — s. 86 | Using, carrying, handling, shipping, transporting or storing firearms, weapons or ammunition carelessly or contrary to prescribed storage rules. |
| Pointing a firearm — s. 87 | Pointing a firearm at another person without lawful excuse, whether loaded or unloaded. |
| Possession for dangerous purpose — s. 88 | Possessing a weapon, imitation, prohibited device or ammunition for a purpose dangerous to the public peace or to commit an offence. |
| Carrying concealed weapon — s. 90 | Carrying a weapon, prohibited device or prohibited ammunition concealed without lawful authorization. |
| Unauthorized possession — s. 91 | Possession without the licence and, where required, registration certificate. |
| Knowing unauthorized possession — s. 92 | Possession while knowing the required licence or registration is absent. |
| Loaded restricted/prohibited firearm — s. 95 | Unauthorized possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, or an unloaded one with readily accessible compatible ammunition. |
| Weapon obtained by crime — s. 96 | Possession while knowing the firearm or other listed item was obtained through an offence. |
| Possession contrary to order — s. 117.01 | Possession while prohibited by a court or statutory order. |
The same incident can produce multiple counts. Each count should be analyzed separately because the mental element, authorization issue and maximum penalty may differ.
POSSESSION
A firearm does not have to be found in someone’s hand or pocket for possession to be alleged.
Cases can involve:
Shared spaces create important factual questions. A firearm found in a vehicle, bedroom, basement, storage locker or residence occupied by multiple people does not automatically prove that every person present possessed it.
The defence may examine:
LICENSING & CLASSIFICATION
Canadian firearms law distinguishes among non-restricted, restricted and prohibited firearms, and the applicable requirements can depend on the specific item.
Section 91 requires a valid licence to possess a firearm and, for restricted or prohibited firearms, a registration certificate. Section 92 adds the element that the person knew they lacked the required authorization.
Classification can also change through legislation or regulation. The Criminal Code and federal regulations have been amended in recent years, and Canada currently has additional rules and programs affecting firearms newly classified as prohibited.
For a defence, the file may require confirmation of:
These are date-specific legal questions. A page like this can explain the framework, but the actual classification and authorization record should be verified for the case.
THE EVIDENCE
The exact location can affect possession. A locked container in a shared room raises different questions from an item found on the accused.
Forensic evidence can be important, but it does not always establish when or why contact occurred. Mixed profiles and transfer issues may require careful interpretation.
Police may rely on spontaneous remarks, recorded interviews, text messages or social media. The defence should assess voluntariness, context and Charter issues.
The accused’s licence status, registration records and any authorizations can be central to sections 91, 92 and 95.
For section 95, the prosecution may rely on whether the firearm was loaded or whether compatible ammunition was readily accessible.
Locks, cases, safes, ammunition storage, vehicle location and transport purpose can matter in careless-storage and regulatory allegations.
Search warrants, officer notes, body-worn video, grounds for detention and the sequence of the search can be as important as the item seized.
— Trusz Law
SEARCH & SEIZURE
Firearms cases frequently begin with a search of a vehicle, home, bag, device or person.
The defence may examine:
A successful Charter challenge is not automatic simply because police made a mistake. The remedy depends on the nature of the breach, the evidence and the applicable legal test. But the search should always be examined where the alleged firearm was discovered through police powers.
PROHIBITION ORDERS
Section 117.01 makes it an offence to possess a firearm, cross-bow, prohibited or restricted weapon, prohibited device, firearm part, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance while prohibited by an order.
The offence can be prosecuted by indictment and currently carries a maximum of 10 years.
Cases may involve:
The defence should confirm the exact order, its wording, duration, service and the item allegedly possessed. A prohibition case can become more complicated where the accused lives with licensed firearm owners or where an item is stored in a shared location.
AFTER THE CHARGE
01 Release or bail
Firearms allegations can create significant bail issues. The Crown may seek detention or strict release conditions depending on the charge, record and circumstances.
02 First court appearance
The accused must comply with all attendance requirements and release conditions, including any weapons prohibition.
03 Disclosure
The defence receives police notes, warrant materials, photographs, forensic reports, body-worn video, licensing records and other prosecution evidence.
04 Possession and search analysis
Counsel examines who controlled the place, how the item was found and whether police acted lawfully.
05 Classification and authorization review
The exact firearm, licence, registration and any prohibition or amnesty issue should be confirmed.
06 Resolution discussions or trial preparation
Depending on the evidence, the case may be resolved or proceed to Charter motions and trial.
COMMON MISTAKES
Giving a detailed statement before understanding the search and disclosure.
A statement can fill gaps in the prosecution case.
Assuming a shared house means no one can be convicted.
The Crown may try to prove constructive or joint possession.
Deleting messages, photos or account records.
These may contain evidence about ownership, access or an alternative explanation.
Contacting co-accused or witnesses contrary to release conditions.
A breach can create a new charge and make bail harder.
Assuming a firearm’s classification from memory.
Classification and amnesty rules are date-specific and should be verified.
Ignoring the exact location of ammunition.
Accessibility can matter under section 95.
Handling or moving seized-related property after police contact.
This can create evidence and obstruction concerns.
Failing to preserve video from the arrest or search.
Private footage may disappear quickly.
HOW TRUSZ LAW CAN HELP
Trusz Law helps people charged with weapons and firearms offences understand the allegation, bail conditions, disclosure and criminal-court process in Ontario.
Depending on the case, that may include challenging possession, reviewing licensing and classification, analyzing search warrants and police conduct, assessing DNA and fingerprint evidence, examining statements and preparing Charter applications or trial defences.
The goal is precise analysis: identify the exact offence, the item’s legal status, the alleged connection to the accused and the lawfulness of the process that produced the evidence.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Section 91 applies where a person possesses a firearm without the required licence and, for a restricted or prohibited firearm, without the required registration certificate. It is hybrid and carries a maximum of five years if prosecuted by indictment.
Section 92 adds that the person knew they did not hold the required licence or registration. It is an indictable offence carrying a maximum of 10 years.
Section 95 applies to unauthorized possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, or an unloaded one together with readily accessible compatible ammunition. It can carry a maximum of 14 years if prosecuted by indictment.
Yes, potentially. Ownership and possession are different questions. The Crown may allege constructive or joint possession if it can prove knowledge and control.
Yes, but presence in a shared vehicle does not automatically prove possession. The location, access, control, statements, forensic evidence and surrounding circumstances matter.
Section 88 applies where a person possesses a weapon, imitation, prohibited device or ammunition for a purpose dangerous to the public peace or for the purpose of committing an offence.
Yes. Section 87 applies to pointing a firearm at another person without lawful excuse whether the firearm is loaded or unloaded.
Yes. Section 86 addresses careless handling, transport and storage and contraventions of prescribed storage rules. The exact facts and applicable regulations matter.
Section 117.01 makes possession contrary to a qualifying order an offence. It can carry a maximum of 10 years if prosecuted by indictment.
Sometimes, depending on the legal authority and circumstances. The defence should review the grounds for detention or arrest, any safety search, consent, exigency and the scope of the search.
Potentially. Where police breach the Charter, the defence may seek exclusion of evidence. The remedy depends on the nature of the breach, the evidence and the applicable legal test.
As early as possible. Firearms charges can create serious bail consequences, and search records, video, forensic evidence and licensing information should be reviewed promptly.
OFFICIAL RESOURCES
Criminal Code — Part III: Firearms and Other Weapons →
Criminal Code — section 91: Unauthorized possession →
Criminal Code — section 92: Knowing unauthorized possession →
Criminal Code — section 95: Loaded prohibited or restricted firearm →
Criminal Code — section 117.01: Possession contrary to order →
Firearms Act →
Federal storage and transportation regulations →
ABOUT THIS RESOURCE
Prepared by Tatyana Trusz, Trusz Law. This resource is for general information only and is not legal advice. Weapons and firearms cases depend on the exact charge, item, legal classification, licence and registration status, search process, evidence and current law. Last reviewed July 2026.
CRIMINAL DEFENCE RESOURCES
Practical guides for understanding criminal charges, court process and defence options.
FACING A WEAPONS OR FIREARMS CHARGE?
Start with the exact offence, the item’s legal status and how police say it was connected to you.